News &
Updates
Updates
- Home
- Aviation & Aerospace
Publication date: May 25, 2018
Data Retention and Management
In the modern information age, no organisation can ignore the lure and obvious utility of the digitisation of data, be it the use of big data to spur business competitiveness, innovation and growth, or through the remote access to information through cloud computing. Despite the use of digitisation improving the ease of doing business, with information from various sources and different formats, companies are faced with myriad organisational, regulatory and legal concerns with respect to data management. There has never been a greater or more pressing need to ensure that a company’s data is reliable, accessible and protected.
Meanwhile, at the level of international law, the Vienna Convention on Road Traffic of 8 November 1968 was amended by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe on 23 March 2016 in order to explicitly allow in traffic autonomous vehicles provided that the self-driving technologies “are in conformity with the United Nations vehicle regulations or can be overridden or switched off by the driver”
The main points discussed by each of the Justices of the Supreme Court in this landmark judgement are summarised and extracted below.
The Right to Privacy – History and Analysis
Authored by: [Author Name], Publication Date: May 25, 2018
On August 24, 2017, a nine-judge constitutional bench assembled by the Supreme Court of India pronounced its judgement in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 494 of 2012 and connected matters (the “Privacy Judgement”), declaring the right to privacy to be a fundamental right under the Constitution of India. By its very nature, the right to privacy is a broad and amorphous right, which “as a concept… may be too broad and moralistic to define… judicially”. The judicial and statutory interpretation of this concept in India has evolved considerably, and post the Privacy Judgment, it is anticipated the law (statutory or otherwise) on this subject will evolve considerably, and at an expedited rate.
The Right to Privacy – History and Analysis
Authored by: [Author Name], Publication Date: May 25, 2018
On August 24, 2017, a nine-judge constitutional bench assembled by the Supreme Court of India pronounced its judgement in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 494 of 2012 and connected matters (the “Privacy Judgement”), declaring the right to privacy to be a fundamental right under the Constitution of India. By its very nature, the right to privacy is a broad and amorphous right, which “as a concept… may be too broad and moralistic to define… judicially”. The judicial and statutory interpretation of this concept in India has evolved considerably, and post the Privacy Judgment, it is anticipated the law (statutory or otherwise) on this subject will evolve considerably, and at an expedited rate.
Right to Privacy – Summary of Individual Judgements
Authored by: [Author Name], Publication Date: May 25, 2018
With the hearing before the Supreme Court of India regarding the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016 reaching a crescendo, now more than ever, it is imperative to take a step back and look at each of the six individual judgements that collectively declared the right to privacy to be a fundamental right in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 494 of 2012.
The main points discussed by each of the Justices of the Supreme Court in this landmark judgement are summarised and extracted below.
Right to Privacy – Summary of Individual Judgements
Authored by: [Author Name], Publication Date: May 25, 2018
With the hearing before the Supreme Court of India regarding the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016 reaching a crescendo, now more than ever, it is imperative to take a step back and look at each of the six individual judgements that collectively declared the right to privacy to be a fundamental right in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 494 of 2012.
The main points discussed by each of the Justices of the Supreme Court in this landmark judgement are summarised and extracted below.